This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
University of San Francisco Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:14880/feed
ISSN 0042-0018
General
Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009January 01, 2009 PDT

Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? and the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About Race

RHONDA V. MAGEE,
RaceLaw School
University of San Francisco Law Review
RHONDA V. MAGEE, Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? And the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About Race, 43 University of San Francisco Law Review 3 (2009).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system